House, Senate contemplate hospital, nursing home cuts

/ Wednesday, February 8, 2012

TALLAHASSEE

Gov. Rick Scott’s controversial plan to overhaul the way Florida hospitals are compensated to treat the state’s poorest and sickest residents — and could have cost the facilities some $1.7 billion next year — has failed to win backing from state lawmakers.

But hospitals can still expect significant state cuts for their Medicaid care in the new budget year, with the House backing a plan to slash rates by 7 percent and the Senate unveiling a measure on Wednesday that could result in a 10 percent reduction.

The new round of budget cuts for hospitals, totalling hundreds of millions of dollars, comes on top of the current budget year, which included some $510 million in rate cuts for hospitals.

“I think everyone’s concerned about any further cuts to a program that was fragile to begin with,” said Gwen MacKenzie, CEO of Sarasota Memorial Hospital, which cares for 95 percent of the Medicaid hospital patients in Sarasota County.

Although the House turned aside Scott’s proposal for a tiered payment system that would dramatically change the way hospitals receive their funding, state Rep. Matt Hudson, chairman of the House health care budget panel, said lawmakers faced “some difficult choices that had to be made” in light of a budget shortfall of more than $1 billion.

In addition to the 7 percent cut for hospitals, the House is calling for a 2.5 percent rate cut for nursing homes that treat Medicaid patients. The cuts total $453 million for hospitals and nursing homes, but the hospitals could face another $200 million in cuts for patient care if state revenues dip in the coming year.

The House proposal, debated on the chamber’s floor on Wednesday, exempted rural hospitals and those that focus on children. It also included a 12-visit annual emergency room limit on non-pregnant adult Medicaid patients.

The Senate Health and Human Services Appropriations Subcommittee on Wednesday advanced a plan that would cut hospital rates by as much as 10 percent, which hospital lobbyists estimated could result in a $458 million reduction. Some 60 percent of the cut would fall on the hospitals that treat the largest populations of Medicaid patients, such as Jackson Memorial, Shands and Sarasota Memorial.

The Senate did not back a rate cut for nursing homes, but the health care panel is considering $86 million in cuts for mental health and drug abuse programs for adults — which are much deeper cuts than the House is contemplating. It also has a six-visit annual limit on emergency room use by Medicaid patients.

Sen. Joe Negron, R-Stuart, chairman of the Senate health care budget panel, said some of the hospital cuts could be offset by developing a new formula for using property tax dollars raised by local communities — including Sarasota — for health care.

While hospital lobbyists described Negron’s proposal as “complicated,” they said it was hard to see how the plan would not result in significant cuts in reimbursement rates for the hospitals.

Tony Carvalho, head of the Safety Net Hospital Alliance of Florida, said his preliminary estimate showed a rate cut in the range of $579 million — when also including a $121 million cut in reimbursements to hospitals from managed care companies.

Negron said the rationale behind the Senate plan is that the state is eventually moving all of its Medicaid patients — subject to approval from the federal government — into a managed care system. Under the current system, those managed care rates for hospital patients are now essentially subsidized by state tax dollars that will disappear when all the Medicaid patients are in an HMO system, he said.

The Senate proposal is a way to transition the hospitals and their Medicaid patients into the managed-care system, with the opportunity to use the locally generated tax dollars to offset some of those reductions, Negron added.

Carvalho said the Senate plan would put “pressure” on the local communities and health care districts to generate more tax dollars — which are matched by federal dollars — to offset the cuts.

Although lawmakers rejected Scott’s plan for a tiered payment system, the House and Senate are also including provisions in their budget plans that could lead to a future system where hospitals are reimbursed for their Medicaid patients based on the patient’s diagnosis.

It would be similar to Medicare, the federal health care program for the elderly, which uses diagnostic related groups to set rates for specific illnesses. Lawmakers want the state Agency for Health Care Administration to develop the plan in the coming year with the possibility of initiating in the 2013-14 budget year.

MacKenzie said she is still waiting to hear the details of the Medicaid cuts.

“They are considering a variety of things,” she said, “including trying to start the Medicaid managed care program earlier than 2014.”

Nursing home administrators said they can deal with a cut in the range of 2.5 percent, although it comes on top of current state and federal funding cuts.

“We’re grateful that the House has limited the cut to only 2.5 (percent), but there are a number of challenges even with that because there are a number of high-Medicaid facilities who will have trouble managing a cut like that,” said Nina Willingham, executive director of the Life Care Center in Sarasota and president of the Florida Health Care Association.

“We’re all still suffering from last year’s cut, and when you put on top of that the 11 percent that we got from Medicare this year, it’s a pretty difficult situation,” she said.

Staff Writer Barbara Peters Smith contributed to this report.

avatar

Lloyd Dunkelberger

Lloyd Dunkelberger is the Htpolitics.com Capital Bureau Chief. He can be reached by email or call (941) 315-0496. ""More Dunkelberger" Make sure to "Like" HT Politics on Facebook for all your breaking political news.
Last modified: February 8, 2012
All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published without permissions. Links are encouraged.

ADD A COMMENT (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
VIEWING 6 COMMENTS
avatar
Brian
Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 7:22 am

Interesting- there wouldn’t be such a budget shortfall if he was wasn’t so interested in catering to corporations (which are formed to make a profit not to provide jobs- private companies are suppose to work with government or support thereof. The anti government stance of Scott and the Republicans is part of the problem) Is there waste? yes Is there fraud? yes Cutting the already ridiculously crap payments to doctors and hospitals is only going to push those engaging in fraus to commit more and the insured will see a raise in cost. How does anyone expect him to undestand the problems when he was at the helm of a healthcare company which engaged in the very fraud which is the problem.

avatar
Marybelle
Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 8:53 am

I am a volunteer at our local hospital and I can see the cuts happening already. FL has problems keeping CEOs/Adminstrators at the various hospitals as they only stay for 3 years at a time, then are transferred to other hospitals. Our meal tickets have been cut; our hospital is a 100 bed hospital and for about one to two years now, it has been less than half. The doctors are charging more for patients as their insurance will pay less and the patients mostly seniors on a fixed income have to shell out a huge co-pay. Many of the patients are treated at our ER and are in there maybe an hour and out the door, many of them are very sick and should be admitted. The surgeries are all out-patients and discharged before they are completely feeling better. Some are discharged right from ICU!!! They should be transferred to Progressive Care for a limited time then discharged.

avatar
MIKE L
Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 9:31 am

Marybelle, what are you talking about in regards to meal tickets? As far as the seniors co-pays getting bigger then they need to have their insurance reviewed annually to make sure that is right plan for them. Also, the vast majority of seniors are on Medicare and the co-insurance is 20% which is not enough. There is an inordinate amount of waste and fraud in both the hospitals and Dr’s offices that until this is corrected there continue to be a huge rise in the costs of medical care.

avatar
Marybelle
Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 11:59 am

Mike, I am talking about the free meal tickets for the volunteers (we put in our time) and patients and family members no longer receiving them. I do agree that there is fraud and waste in the doctors’ offices and hospitals, but … we received a crappy 3.6% increase without a COLA for the past 2 years and Medicare took out more money from our Social Security. Our physician and many others do not accept Medicaid at all. It is pretty tough for seniors and younger people to pay out-of-pocket expense especially if the younger people are unemployed. Brian is right when he said our FL Governor was at the helm of the Health Care Industry and look how he got elected. We are ruled by the insurance companies, corporations, banks, and Wall Street. Medicare is not the savior people think it is. They are crooked just as much. We are sold down the river. You must be a Tea Party Republican.

avatar
drrjv
Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 8:41 pm

ER Visits and Hospitalizations are costing society millions of dollars. The problem is that trying to fix the ER or the hospital is the wrong approach. Please read this article for some real insight about this problem (from the New Yorker Magazine.)

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/01/24/110124fa_fact_gawande

avatar
Sandip
Friday, March 2, 2012 at 11:36 pm

This process used to be leclad the dehumanization of persons. Now it is better leclad the commodification of patients. For hospitals and physicians to buy into it is appalling. Even worse, the so-called research that Quintiles might generate will be next to worthless. Insult upon injury.