Tea party: Warming or resigned to Mitt Romney?

/ Tuesday, February 7, 2012

DENVER

Long skeptical of Mitt Romney, tea party activists are either warming up to the GOP presidential front-runner or reluctantly backing him after abandoning hope of finding a nominee they like better.

Whatever the reason, the former Massachusetts governor who is coming off of back-to-back victories in Florida and Nevada now is picking up larger shares of the tea party vote than he did when the Republican nomination fight began. And that fact alone illuminates the struggles of the nearly three-year-old movement to greatly influence its first presidential race.

Mitt Romney

“We haven’t gone away,” insisted Amy Kremer, chairwoman of the national Tea Party Express. But, in the same breath, she acknowledged lower expectations and a shift in focus to Senate races over the White House campaign. She also pleaded for patience, saying: “Anybody that thinks we are going to change things in one cycle or two cycles is fooling themselves.”

Tea party activists across the country entered their first presidential contest this year expecting to hold major sway over the Republican race following a 2010 congressional election year in which their favored candidates successfully knocked off a string of insiders in GOP primaries in Colorado and elsewhere.

The movement influenced the presidential race early on, with candidates from Romney on down parroting the movement’s language and promoting its agenda of restrained spending to curry favor with its adherents.

But the coalition was greatly fractured and plagued by infighting. It also watched as one favored candidate after another lost standing or quit the race, among them Georgia businessman Herman Cain and Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann. The remaining candidates — Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul — have attributes that tea party backers like but they face huge hurdles in knocking Romney off his stride.

That’s left many in the tea party shifting focus to Romney, a candidate viewed by many as most likely to unseat President Barack Obama, even if he doesn’t vociferously bang the drum of their top issues.

“We’re warming up to Romney,” said Brian Walker, a tea party member and 62-year-old sheet metal contractor in the Colorado mountain town of Florissant. He raves about Santorum but said he’s leaning toward Romney because he wants to support the candidate he views as the likely nominee.

Such perceptions may be one of the reasons Romney has seen a bump in support among tea party followers even though the movement has long been irked by Romney’s tentative embrace of it and evolution on several issues it holds dear.

In South Carolina last month, exit polls showed that only about 1 in 4 self-described tea party supporters backed Romney in the primary, which Gingrich ended up winning. But 10 days later, 41 percent of tea partyers in Florida’s primary chose Romney as he cruised to victory there. And in Nevada, entrance polls showed that Romney won 47 percent of the tea party vote on Saturday, crushing his rivals in the state.

Romney could perform just as well in Colorado and Minnesota caucuses on Tuesday. He won both four years ago. Since then, both states have been heavily influenced by the tea party.

In 2010, tea party supporters in both states claimed credit for usurping well-funded GOP insiders and producing conservative gubernatorial nominees, Dan Maes in Colorado and Tom Emmer in Minnesota. Both lost the general election, despite big Republican successes elsewhere.

Colorado Republicans also nominated a conservative tea party favorite, Ken Buck, over a better-funded candidate, former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton. But Buck also lost the general election to the appointed Democratic senator, Michael Bennet, who had never before run for political office.

Mindful of the tea party strains in both states, Romney’s rivals are playing to the movement in hopes of engineering comebacks.

“I ask you to reset this race. Create an opportunity for someone who can speak to Americans about what America is all about,” Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator, said Saturday in northern Colorado.

Some tea party activists argue that the GOP puts itself at risk if it ignores conservative critics of Romney, even if tea party influence appears diminished.

“I do not believe in this idea that you vote for the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils is still evil,” said Erika Vadnais, 48, an engineer from Colorado Springs who attended a Paul rally last week.

Kremer, the Tea Party Express chairwoman, disagreed and predicted that tea party conservatives will recover from divisions between now and November.

“At the end of the day, the movement will come together to defeat Barack Obama,” Kremer said.

Last modified: February 7, 2012
All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published without permissions. Links are encouraged.

ADD A COMMENT (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
VIEWING 8 COMMENTS
avatar
Marybelle
Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 4:04 pm

I would not vote for any of them. No thank you!!!

avatar
Ken Henkel
Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 4:51 pm

My calendar reads that it is still Feburary. There is still time for a resurgence of someone besides the designer of Mass. health care. Romney is not getting my vote nor my money.

avatar
Dan Eisenberg
Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 5:07 pm

I found amusing your characterization “parroting the movement’s language and promoting its agenda of restrained spending to curry favor with its adherents”. Even a parrot is smart enough to know spending is out of control. Think of the tea party as you grandfather trying to warn you that you are spending beyond your means and doing what he can to make you see the consequences before it’s too late.

The tea party is intrinsically a local movement. The Republican nomination process isn’t. If the Republican party thinks someone from central casting is their best bet to beat Obama, so be it. The tea party remains focused on conservative government and will pursue that end no matter which party is in power and how corrupt they are.

The rumors of the death of the tea party (or waning influence) is no more than media spin.

avatar
SRQ Tad
Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 5:39 pm

It’s not that the TEA party is warming to Romney. It is, at the moment, the TEA vote is split among the other three. Even in FL, 54% did NOT vote for Romney.
A current (2/2-2/6) Reuters/Ipsos poll puts Romney in first with 29%, Paul in a single-digit second place at 21% with Gingerich and Santorum in close 3′rd and 4′th with 19% and 18%, respectively… Do the math.

1) The only GOP candidate that consistently defeats Obama in head-to-head polls is Ron Paul.
2) The only GOP candidate that embraces all of the TEA tenets is Ron Paul.
3) The only TWO candidates on the ballots in all 50 states are Romney and Paul.

Also, while the lesser of two evils IS still evil, not going to polls for that reason, last time around, only served to net us the greater of the two evils. The vast majority of those GOP Conservatives and Libertarians who stayed home in 2008 due to the poor choices have learned their lesson and WILL vote for the GOP candidiate in the 2012 general… However, to vote for “the likely candidiate” in the primary, simply to be on the side of some media-predestined “winner” is both foolhardy and cowardly. Neither is descriptive of a TEA partying Conservative.

avatar
Crisw57
Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 6:13 pm

The essence of the Tea Party movement is being lost in this discussion. We want to stop the explosive growth of government, the nanny state where everyone gets a hand out, and the stripping away of our liberties. We understand that the progrssives have been building toward socialism for a very long time. We also understand that we won’t fix things in one election cycle. But we are in it for the long run.

Unfortunately, the Republican establishment has moved so far from the right that
it is hard to distinguish them from the Democrats. But the people of this country
are sure of where they stand.

So will we support Romney or Gingrich or Santorem or Paul? You bet. If we are given a choice between anyone of them and the President, it is no contest. Why? Because we know this President will be the death of everything we hold dear if he gets reelected. It will only be by the grace of God, if he doesn’t take us down before Nov. 2012.

So, yes, we may be less than enchanted by the choices and, frankly, a little
leary of all politicians but I have no doubt we will turn out in droves to defeat the President. Then we will roll up our sleeves and get ready for round 3 and 4 and 5, etc.

avatar
Dave Kesselring
Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 10:55 pm

Tea Party principles: Constitutional Government, free market, and fiscal responsibility

Ron Paul: The Defender of the Constitution. Named Dr. No in Congress for voting no to everything that isn’t Constitutional
The only candidate that has any understanding of free market economics
The most fiscally responsible congressman in Washington, even returns a nice sized portion of his budget each year

What is the point of having an organization with a set of core principals and ignoring them when it comes time to really step up for our country?

avatar
Dono
Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 6:11 am

The T-axed E-nough A-lready Party grew huge during he lowest tax rates in 50 years.
So, it wasn’t taxes that bothered them.
Wonder what about this President was different.

avatar
HOHN
Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 6:17 am

MITTEN THE MORMOM took an awful beating last night in MInnesota,colorado,and missouri.Looks like he cant even BUY his way to the whitehouse…..BYBYBY GOP