Scott opposes bill shifting health departments to local control

/ Tuesday, February 7, 2012

TALLAHASSEE

 Gov. Rick Scott said on Tuesday that he opposes a plan to have counties take greater control over local health departments, a move that had local government officials and public health advocates prepared to fight.

The controversial plan, approved by a House health care panel on Monday, would have Florida provide block grants to 67 counties and within two years put the departments under the control of county governments instead of the state health department.

The bill is sponsored by Rep. Matt Hudson, R-Naples, who has sought to streamline the massive Department of Health over the last several years.

But Scott, a former health care executive who once ran the nation’s largest hospital chain, questioned whether the proposal would reduce costs or improve services.

“If it doesn’t do something that is going to make the lives of Florida citizens better, why would we think about doing that?” Scott asked. “I haven’t seen anything in the bill that does any of those things.”

Scott’s comments, and a tepid reception in the Senate, could doom the idea this year.

Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, one of the top Republicans in that chamber, said out of deference to the House that the Senate would consider the legislation. He said giving counties more flexibility could be beneficial.

But he said that placing the departments under the auspices of county government may “be a bridge too far.”

Scott has been careful this session in commenting on pending legislation, rendering a verdict only a handful of bills.

But his criticism Tuesday of the measure was applauded by some county officials.

Both Manatee and Charlotte counties had expressed fears that the bill would increase their financial obligations for maintaining services offered at the health departments.

“It had a lot of people concerned,” said Nicholas Azzara from Manatee County.

Azzara said that the county commissioners were prepared to discuss the issue with the local delegation, including Rep. Jim Boyd, who voted for the bill, when they travel to Tallahassee next week. Azzara also said the county was poised to write opposition letters.

Azzara said Scott’s opposition indicates that he understood “what this could have meant for the counties.”

Block grants are usually large sums of money from the federal or state government but they have less restrictions on how they need to be spent.

Giving counties control over the health departments would mean those employees no longer worked for the state. As many as 12,000 employees statewide could have been impacted by the policy change.

While Scott said he opposes the block grant approach for county health departments, he is a firm believer that federal block grants would help Florida better manage its Medicaid program.

Defending the mammoth Department of Health also contradicts a report assembled by a hand-picked team assembled by Scott and tasked with making recommendations on how the state’s health and human services system could be improved.

The task force recommended that the state consider merging the Department of Health with other health care related departments. The health department is charged with protecting and promoting public health. It also is responsible for regulating health care professionals and it must be run by a doctor.

The Manatee County Health Department has 126 staff and a $9.2 million operating budget, and five locations, information from the state shows. The county is responsible for funding about 10 percent of the budget, or $929,000, Azzara said.

There are nearly 400 state employees working at the Sarasota County Health Department which has a $29.1 million budget for state fiscal year 2011-12.

Charlotte County spokeswoman Elaine Jones said the proposal would have given the county a stronger voice in what services to provide. But she said the county had concerns that the state wouldn’t adequately fund the health departments.

“Our concern is that they have a habit of providing start-up and discontinuing that funding,” Jones said.

avatar

Christine Sexton

Christine Jordan Sexton is a correspondent for HT Politics.com. She is based in Tallahassee. If you have suggestions for the weekly legislative calendar, please contact Political Editor Victor Hull at victor.hull@ heraldtribune.com
Last modified: February 7, 2012
All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published without permissions. Links are encouraged.

ADD A COMMENT (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
VIEWING 8 COMMENTS
avatar
JackTaraz
Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 10:19 am

I have been fighting the Sarasota County Department of Health, which is STAFFED with State of Florida employees.

This is the house in Venice that has been in the news. One inch of RAW sewage in the house, with 3 & 6 year old children living inside. The parents are in jail awaiting trial on drug charges and Child Endangerment charges. The rest of the house is just as bad, broken windows, hole in roof, 3 ft. piles of trashed clothes and other junk. The State Employee, a Mr. David Macci, (David_Macci@doh.state.fl.us) said, and I quote: ” Raw sewage inside a house is NOT a Health Code Violation in the State of Florida.” He then goes on to say that the issue is a “grey area” in the law and could be a violation. Translation: He will not do his job. MY comment to Mr. Macci and his Supervisors, a Ms. Virginia Bess (Virginia_Bess@doh.state.fl.us) and a Mr. Charles Henry (Charles_Henry@doh.state.fl.us) is that “IF RAW sewage inside a home, especially with 3 & a 6 year old children is NOT a Health Code Violation, then WHAT IS??? The only thing worse that I could think of would be worse is Nuclear Waste. So, effectively, Rick Scott does NOT HAVE a functioning Department of Health, and it should be disbanded immediately. We can re-form it when Rick Scott is voted out next election.

avatar
mark
Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 10:44 am

A reoccurring problem ALL OVER THE STATE AND IN THE HOUSE is having raw Rick Scott all over the floor…pew!The state is understaffed and understaffed and jobs have been cut so they are again understaffed…you may try calling city cod enforcement to see what your options are …but definitely cast your votes for democrats next and all elections if you want things to smell better…good luck citizen !!

avatar
JENNIFER HIGHLAND
Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 1:04 pm

Before any more discussion of whether these kind of changes save money; hurt individual health departments; burden counties; etc, legislators and others need to read the history and evolution of public health in this country and worldwide. Public health must be a large scale effort on the state’s and nation’s parts lest we revert back to medieval times when isolated villages had no idea about the spread of disease or what the best practices for eradication were. Of course, it would never be that bad now because of our advanced knowledge and communication capabilities, but fracturing public health down to the county level of responsibility would greatly risk our nation’s and state’s ability to address public health by limiting broad scale epidemiology, data tracking, using and teaching best practices in health care,and the like. Epidemics are still around! One example: can you imagine what the size of the recent outbreak of the H1N1 influenza virus would have been had there not been national and statewide efforts to control it? Decentralizing is NOT congruent with public health; it is quite the opposite.

avatar
mark
Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 8:19 pm

H1N1 influenza virus cost how much and panicked a nation and for what reason? I would think our society would run better with out media frenzy. I do however see your point it would be said that bottom dollar needs to be weighed with a conscious geared not just for profit but maintaining a level of care for the public that is paying the costs to run the facility…we no longer live in a society where the customer comes first but more of a ceo comes first second and lastly a ceo…sounds like the greedy 1% wins hands down every time…while the consumer/workers get the bill

avatar
JENNIFER HIGHLAND
Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 10:06 am

Remember that media and public health authorities are two different entities, and the media reacted the way the media wanted to. It’s not reflective of what public health authorities were doing, which was a well-integrated and appropriate campaign disseminated throughout the country and states on preventing transmission of the virus, and probably directly contributed to it not turning into the problem it could have.

avatar
mark
Friday, February 10, 2012 at 12:17 am

Ahh yes they are but the reporters did get the information and reported on it.Our own health department in my neck of the woods was also on the band wagon. I do not think the H1N1 is the best example to use but i still agree overall.

avatar
mark
Friday, February 10, 2012 at 12:28 am

The legislature and Rick Scott are out of tune with the public needs and wants.They continue to look for what constituents have bought and paid for at the price of jobs and decency. If i make a for cast for the future it will continue to be a balancing of the budget on the middle class and poor while the the legislature and Haridopolos and Scott continue to reign in as much power and money that they can. It has nothing to do at this point on having a common sense conscious but greed

avatar
Marybelle
Friday, February 10, 2012 at 10:47 am

The sooner Rick Scott is voted out for re-election, the better. I remember Governor Graham who was a Democrat; he listened and talked to the residents of FL
to understand the problems that we face especially with the individual counties, the County Commissioners, and also the Board of Directors and Management of the various communities within the state. I remember my husband as President on the Board of Directors in our district and listened to my husband for at least an hour. Governor Graham was very compassionate and was interested in the well-being of our problems within the community. I can’t say the same about Governor Jeb Bush nor this piece of protoplasm that we have at the moment. They just don’t care to listen, they do what they want. BTW, I voted for Alex Sink a Democrat. The State of FL is overrun by too many Republicants. This is my opinion.