Romney: “Not concerned about the very poor”

/ Wednesday, February 1, 2012

EAGAN, Minn.

Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney, confident after his Florida primary victory, ended up inviting criticism Wednesday when he said he’s “not concerned about the very poor” because they have an “ample safety net.”

Democrats and Republicans alike — including opponent Newt Gingrich — pounced and the GOP front-runner quickly sought to explain his remarks.

“No, no, no, no, no, no, no,” Romney told reporters on his campaign plane when asked about the comments. “No, no, no. You’ve got to take the whole sentence, all right, it’s mostly the same.” He said his remark was consistent with his theme throughout the race, adding: “My energy is going to be devoted to helping middle-income people.”

Despite that explanation, Romney’s comments quickly became an immediate distraction from his message that he’s more conservative than Gingrich and from the double-digit thumping the former House speaker sustained in Florida. His campaign worked behind the scenes to provide context for the comment.

Gingrich raised Romney’s remark at his first event since losing the Florida primary. He read Romney’s quotes aloud and they were met with boos from the crowd at a brewery in Reno, Nev.

“I am fed up with politicians in either party dividing Americans against each other,” Gingrich said. “I am running to be the president of all the American people and I am concerned about all the American people.”

As the day began, Romney told CNN from Florida: “I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich. They’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

“You can focus on the very poor, that’s not my focus,” he said.

President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign was quick to criticize.

“So much for ‘we’re all in this together,”’ tweeted Obama campaign manager Jim Messina.

Some conservative pundits also labeled it a gaffe and said it was evidence Romney wasn’t prepared to run against Obama.

“The issue here is not that Romney is right or wrong, but that he is handing choice sound bites to the Democrats to make him as unlikeable as he made Newt Gingrich,” said Erick Erickson on the conservative RedState blog. And Jonah Goldberg at the conservative National Review Online said of Romney: “Every time he seems to get into his groove and pull away he says things that make people think he doesn’t know how to play the game.”

With criticism mounting, Romney flew to Minnesota and addressed a rally before heading to Nevada. He also boasted in flight about his “huge” Florida victory.

Gay rights protesters in Minnesota threw glitter at Romney before he took the stage, making him the latest candidate to be “glittered” by activists opposed to his position on gay rights. Romney, who opposes gay marriage, put a positive spin on the sparkle in his hair.

“This is confetti! We just won Florida,” he said as he took the stage.

Romney, whose central challenge is winning over skeptical conservatives, told reporters on the plane that the fact that he performed strongly among conservatives in Florida made sense because he’s more conservative than Gingrich.

“I’m not saying he’s not conservative. I’m just saying he’s not the pure conservative he would have people believe, and I think folks in Florida saw through that,” Romney said. His campaign also started airing a radio ad in Colorado on Wednesday that says “conservatives across America are supporting Mitt Romney.”

But Romney immediately was forced to clarify his comments about the poor.

Asked whether his words might strike some as odd, Romney said: “We will hear from the Democrat party the plight of the poor and there’s no question, it’s not good being poor, and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor.” Romney added that he’s more worried about the unemployed, people living on Social Security and those struggling to send their kids to college.

“We have a very ample safety net and we can talk about whether it needs to be strengthened or whether there are holes in it. But we have food stamps, we have Medicaid, we have housing vouchers, we have programs to help the poor,” Romney said. “But the middle-income Americans, they’re the folks that are really struggling right now.”

Romney has broached the subject of the poor repeatedly on the campaign trail but until Wednesday had been more careful in his choice of words.

“I worry about the very poor and I want to make sure that our safety net is there,” Romney said in New Hampshire in December, says the middle class are “the people I’m really concerned about right now.”

Wednesday wasn’t the first time that Romney, who made millions working in private equity, has been accused of insensitivity on matters of wealth. He once said “I like being able to fire people” when talking about having the ability to choose service providers. He also has declared that he knew what it was like to worry about being “pink-slipped” out of a job.

 

WASHINGTON

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Wednesday that he’s “not concerned about the very poor” because they have an “ample safety net” and he’s focused instead on relieving the suffering of middle-class people hit hard by the bad economy.

In comments likely to become fodder for his critics, Romney emphasized, “You can focus on the very poor, that’s not my focus.”

He brought up the subject of the poor in a CNN interview marking his big win in Florida’s GOP primary Tuesday night, a major step toward becoming the party’s challenger to President Barack Obama in the fall. A multi-millionaire former venture capitalist, Romney has been criticized by Democrats and his Republican rivals alike for earlier remarks seen as insensitive, such as saying “I like being able to fire people” and declaring that he knew what it was like to worry about being “pink-slipped” out of a job.

“I’m not concerned about the very poor.” he said Wednesday. “We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich. They’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

Asked whether his comment about the poor might come across as odd to some, Romney reiterated.

“We will hear from the Democrat party the plight of the poor and there’s no question, it’s not good being poor, and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor,” Romney said, adding that he’s more worried about the unemployed, people living on Social Security and those struggling to send their kids to college.

“We have a very ample safety net and we can talk about whether it needs to be strengthened or whether there are holes in it. But we have food stamps, we have Medicaid, we have housing vouchers, we have programs to help the poor,” Romney said. “But the middle-income Americans, they’re the folks that are really struggling right now.”

 

Last modified: February 1, 2012
All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published without permissions. Links are encouraged.

ADD A COMMENT (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
VIEWING 17 COMMENTS
avatar
Marybelle
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 3:55 pm

I am sorry, I don’t trust the Conservative Republicans or the Tea Partiers. They are not looking out for the middle class or the poor. We are not considered the middle class anymore, we are the new poor. I would prefer that they all be voted out of Congress.

avatar
Brian
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 5:45 pm

The issue is that the poor have become a larger group and the cuts the Republicans want to make to keep from raising taxes affects them greatly. It is troubling that the person running for president would not be concerned, in a country as great as ours, we should have as many lower income or zero income citizens. The amount of poor or lower income is more than 5& of the country- and what about all the children who have to grow up in the poverty. Incredible! I think it more that he knows many of the poor do not vote. I agree, Marybelle, I do not trust the Tea Party nor any of the Republicans.

avatar
AJLind
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 6:00 pm

He is right: If we do not protect the middle WORKING class then WE WILL ALL BE THE “POOR” CLASS WHICH IS ENSLAVED TO WELFARE SURVIVAL. The “working” or “middle” class is the motor that drives the economy. If the “working” or “middle” class gets the economy rolling again then we will pull the “poor” into the middle class with jobs. That is the point. And for any of you who want four more years of the same VOTUS (Vacationer of The United States) or Vacationer-in-Chief with his $50,000. lingerie-buying wife Michelle then you truly are A) Very poor and do not care since you are happy with only surviving or B) Very wealthy and politics do not interest you. THE MIDDLE “WORKING” CLASS NEEDS SAVING OR THIS COUNTRY — AND THE WORLD — WILL FAIL AND THE BIGGEST DEPRESSION THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN WILL OCCUR. God bless America and my fellow Republicans.

avatar
Dono
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 7:29 pm

Republicans are on record saying middle class starts around annual income of a million dollars. That is who they will be watching out for.

avatar
Michelle McLean
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 8:14 pm

Nice job taking a statement out of context HT.

avatar
Dali
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 8:15 pm

As usual the Liberal Media (Lamestream Media) Took the comment out of context. As for the republicans protecting the rich so is Obama but only those wealthy people who contribute to his re-election. I have never worked for a poor person. And without them there would not be any jobs out there except Government and I don’t know about all of you but our Government is running out of money because they are NOT business people. They have a spending problem and if Obama gets back in we are all screwed.

avatar
AJLind
Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 9:03 pm

“DONO” you really “DON’T-KNOW” do you? You’re WRONG: Show us all the exact link where Republicans say middle class starts at a million dollars? Show us! You won’t because you’re spewing garbage out of your mouth. Keep drinking the purple Kool-Aid. Oh and Michelle McLean? I agree. Hope that Halifax fires their loser editor-in-chief who actually dared to say that HT is “objective.” Made me laugh, actually, when I read that piece of crap from this liberal rag.

avatar
Snuffy
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 6:04 am

Taken out of context!

avatar
Apu
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 6:24 am

Why should Romney care about the poor? he only pays 14% in taxes, I pay 27%,
so I am shouldering the roads, police, fire fighters, education, services he uses for which he should be contributing more than the mere 14%. I do not
want this kind of guy on the White House. His anti immigrant rhetoric is shameful, after all he is the son of a Mexican national. Tax brakes for the rich
go ahead.

avatar
HOHN
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 6:34 am

Tax subsidies for the major corporations like exxon,walmart,caterpillar,harley davidson,just to name a very few,and then the money goes to shareholders in dividends,kind of like socialism for the rich,goodbye gop and dont let the toilet bowl hid you in the head as we flush you to the sewer where you belong!!!!

avatar
HOHN
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 6:42 am

I see that MITTEN the MORMOM got caught in another series of lies about his blind trust.He said they sold shares of a chinese stem cell company from Their BLIND trust in 2007,as it turns out they had buy buying them up until 2011.Those MORMONS have a hard time telling the truth.How much did his son Tag and him make off the allen stanford ponzi scheme that they were part of

avatar
Fredo
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 8:28 am
avatar
Robin 'Roblimo' Miller
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 8:41 am

Those darn lamestream liberal media! How DARE they report what Romney said. Worse, how DARE that Soledad O’Brien woman give him a chance to retract or modify his statement. Grrr… all those darn FACTS with their LIBERAL BIAS need to be gotten rid of. And those reporters who ask EMBARRASSING QUESTIONS need to stop. Now let’s all get together and sing the Republican fight song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkRIbUT6u7Q

avatar
SRQIggy
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 12:02 pm

Here we go again with the typical Tabloid Liberal responses to a partial quote, taken completely out of context. Heaven forbid you should deal in FACTS, or do some basic research. Instead you deal in hyperbole, misdirection and sarcasm.

Hey, Dono, provide a link to this so-called “record”.

avatar
AJLind
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 1:24 pm

SRQIGGY: I SAID THE SAME THING TO “DONO” AND HE NEVER POSTED A LINK…WHY DO YOU THINK? THE FACT IS THIS: LIBERALS ARE BASICALLY TOO STUPID TO DO MATH OR WORK, PERIOD. I’M ON LUNCH BREAK FROM A JOB POSTING HERE…EVER HEAR OF A THING CALLED A JOB FOLKS? AND GUESS WHAT: THERE *ARE* JOBS AROUND EVEN IF YOU MAKE ONE YOURSELF AS SIMPLE AS CUTTING GRASS OR CLEANING HOUSES, ETC. PEOPLE JUST DO NOT WANT TO WORK AND WANT THE AMERICAN TEAT AKA LIBERAL WELFARE PROGRAMS TO SUCKLE THEM. TIME TO VOTE THE “VOTUS” OR VACATIONER-OF-THE-UNITED-STATES OUT OF OFFICE!

avatar
BJHUNNY
Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 4:38 pm

America is one of the most pedestrian/renter/worker hostile places on the planet, because it is run by people who cannot concieve of not driving, owning their own car and business. The “ladder rungs” that should be there to assist low-capital clients are not there, anyone who does not understand this has been hiding under a rock the last hundred years. Perhaps it is time to change direction…. after we balance the budget, something Obama seems incapable of doing,

avatar
HOHN
Friday, February 3, 2012 at 7:46 am

Just cut the defense and stop terrorizing other countries