House Ethics Committee investigating Buchanan

/ Thursday, December 22, 2011

The U.S. House Ethics Committee confirmed on Thursday that it is conducting an inquiry into Rep. Vern Buchanan for an undisclosed matter.

It is the third federal body to investigate the Longboat Key Republican. The Justice Department and Federal Election Commission currently have on-going investigations connected to Buchanan.

House Ethics Committee chairman Rep. Jo Bonner, R-Alabama, and ranking member Rep. Linda T. Sanchez, D-Calif., released a joint statement Thursday saying the committee has been reviewing Buchanan, R-Longboat Key, since Nov. 8 and will “announce its course of action in this matter on or before” Feb. 6.

While Democrats and government watchdog groups have previously called on the Ethics Committee to investigate Buchanan, Thursday’s notice is the first official acknowledgment of an inquiry.

Buchanan congressional spokesman Max Goodman said the Ethics Committee’s action is a routine notification but refused to say what the inquiry was about.

“We are constructively engaged with the House Ethics Committee and are confident that the committee will dismiss this matter,” Goodman said. “Because of the confidential nature of these proceedings, we can have no further comment at this time.”

To deal with the growing legal turmoil, Buchanan’s campaign paid Patton Boggs, a high-powered Washington, D.C., law firm for $50,000 in January to defend Buchanan before the FEC. William McGinley, a partner with the firm, also is representing Buchanan in relation to the Justice Department inquiry.

Whether the Ethics Committee inquiry is connected to either of the FEC or Justice Department’s actions is unclear. A spokeswoman for the Office of Congressional Ethics, which forwarded the Buchanan case to the Ethics Committee, said she could not comment on the matter because it is an ongoing issue.

The Office of Congressional Ethics’s fowarding of the case to the Ethics Committee could be notable. Rules for the OCE instruct it to forward issues to the Ethics Committee if there is “substantial reason to believe the allegations” made against a member of Congress.

When complaints are logged by the public against a member of Congress, the OCE considers the issue before determining whether it should be reviewed by the 10-member Ethics Committee.

No Ethics Committee members are from Florida.

The Ethics Committee announcement came one day after newly leaked Federal Election Commission records revealed that three car dealerships Buchanan had owned violated federal election laws and that evidence suggested Buchanan “more likely than not” violated the same laws.

Those FEC documents say investigators did not pursue charges against Buchanan specifically for organizing the illegal donations because his main accuser and former business partner Sam Kazran did not provide enough credible evidence. However, the FEC did go after Buchanan’s car dealerships where the alleged violations happened.

Though the nearly year-old FEC documents became public Wednesday, agency officials have refused to comment on them. An FEC spokeswoman said the agency cannot comment on the Buchanan investigation until the case is closed.

The records show the agency has concluded that at three dealerships, employees and business partners gave donations to Buchanan and were later reimbursed by Buchanan’s businesses – a violation of federal law.

The FEC has already imposed civil penalties on three of the former Buchanan dealerships for the violations in connection with his 2006 and 2008 campaigns: Venice Dodge Nissan, Hyundai of North Jacksonville and Suncoast Ford in New Port Richey.

Buchanan, who once owned more than 19 car dealerships, has never been personally fined by the FEC or charged with arranging the donations. He sold his interests in both Venice Dodge Nissan and Suncoast Ford in late 2010, according to financial disclosure reports he filed with the U.S. House of Representatives.

Buchanan’s employees and partners at two dealerships signed conciliation agreements with the FEC acknowledging the violations at the dealerships and agreed to pay the fines. Under the agreements, Hyundai of North Jacksonville was fined about $68,000, Venice Dodge Nissan about $11,000 and Suncoast Ford and its minority owner a total of $15,500.

Buchanan and his campaign spokeswoman Sally Tibbetts declined to comment on the fines.

Click here to read  a joint statement on Thursday saying the committee has been reviewing Buchanan since Nov. 8 in a undisclosed matter.

avatar

Jeremy Wallace

Jeremy Wallace has covered politics for more than 15 years.He can be reached by email or call (941) 361-4966.""More Wallace"Make sure to "Like" HT Politics on Facebook for all your breaking political news.
Last modified: December 22, 2011
All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published without permissions. Links are encouraged.

ADD A COMMENT (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
VIEWING 25 COMMENTS
avatar
ea
Thursday, December 22, 2011 at 2:28 pm

Typical Herald Tribune witch hunt..This paper is looking more like the National Enquiror every day.

avatar
Truth
Thursday, December 22, 2011 at 3:16 pm

Seems like a illegitimate story to me “EA”. Would the public not want to know this was going on? For you to suggest this is a witch hunt is laughable. You must be one of the people on the take for sure.

avatar
Michael
Thursday, December 22, 2011 at 3:26 pm

It happened or it did not.

avatar
Earl
Thursday, December 22, 2011 at 3:54 pm

LOL – if you really believe there is a witch hunt shouldn’t you go all Glen Beck on the House Ethics committee and not the the Herald-Tribune??

And for goodness sake wouldn’t you want to know if your congressman is a crook regardless of party?? Especially one with such a sordid history as Buchanan?

You people are too much….

avatar
tom lyons
Thursday, December 22, 2011 at 6:19 pm

EA, that’s just absurd. What would you have said if a local congressman was from your not-favorite party and, when he became the subject of an announced congressional ethics inquiry, this newspaper did not report it?
My guess it you’d see it as wrong, hiding important news, proof of bias, etc.

avatar
Jose DelMingal
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 2:43 am

Oh my goodness I hope Vern doesn’t suffer the horrendous fate of the Democrat superstars Charlie Rangel and Maxime Waters….How pathetic Jerm Wallace is with his” swan song”. story..Don’t forget folks…Halifax Media Hioldings LLC…Little Rock Ark…

avatar
HOHN
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 6:42 am

Vern Buchanan stole 15 million from merrill lynch in michigan before moving to florida.That is what he financed his start of life in florida with,other peoples hard earned money,STOLEN!!question for his supporters,would you also vote for charlie manson if he was on your side,I already know the answer…. YOU WOULD!!!!

avatar
HOHN
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 6:44 am

maybe we need to check to see if citizens are using this board,or just some more illegals!!!C

avatar
joe
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 7:10 am

and you sarasota people keep voting for this crook !!!

avatar
Fredo
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 8:03 am

Politicians = thieves
Partisan comments = brainwashed citizens

avatar
FlaWestGuy
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 8:17 am

Below is an excerpt from The Bradenton Times article by Dennis Maley about this crook!!

http://www.thebradentontimes.com/news/2011/12/23/national_government/buchanan_narrowly_escapes_in_fec_investigation/
—————————————–
Sarasota GOP chair Joe Gruters sent out an email yesterday claiming that Buchanan had been “completely exonerated on all charges,” and that the FEC “voted unanimously to clear Vern of any wrongdoing.” Gruters, who failed to mention that as Buchanan’s former campaign treasurer, he too was part of the investigation, clearly hadn’t read the FEC’s report, as there was nothing remotely resembling a complete exoneration or clearing the Congressman of any wrongdoing in its findings. In fact, the report maintained there very well could have been wrongdoing and even insisted on taking time to refute a number of Buchanan’s arguments as to why he was innocent, calling them “factually incorrect.”
—————————————–

avatar
Michael
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 8:31 am

American Speedy Printing story in Michigan has always followed Vern around. He needs to be looked at.

avatar
mike
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 8:33 am

i have not voted for the crook one single time , i had friends who worked for one of his dealerships, not the one in ?? , i have heard how he works , he needs to be voted out , watch how he votes , the paper has it every sunday in the “A” section , he votes party lines everytime , and only votes when he no’s it’s safe to , notice how he missed the vote this week on the tax bill ? and in the past , has missed many votes because he dosent want to draw attention to himself and play it safe by not being there to vote , or votes present , i dont no why,ANYBODY,SOMEBODY,PLEASE RUN AGAINST HIM , the “R”‘s are in truble and if there is a hand full left after the next elecyion ill be suprised , what a bunch !

avatar
Dutch
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 8:55 am

It is he said she said. But look at the facts. The employees admit they were given the money to contribute to Vern’s campaign. Now who has the incentive to give them the money? Is it Vern or his auto dealer partner? Since you cannot believe either one I wold say it was Vern who had the most to gain from giving them the money.

avatar
Nikki
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 9:29 am

If his campaign traded money this way – it is a clear violation of Federal Election laws – which there are many. What I have been waiting for the FEC to investigate Obama and his $5 donations -now $3 because few are giving to him. Some complaints had come in from people after 2008 election in Eurpope that found charges on their cards for Obama campaign donations…These people stated on the news there – they would have no reason to donate to him and wanted to know why the charges were on their cards… The $5 donations made me wonder how this scam would work -FEC doesn’t require low amounts to be reported – so was it a scam to hide other dollars coming in from foreign countries where they could attach American citizen names to the contributions if question…It is every American citizens duty to monitor their elections to make sure they stay fair.

avatar
LK
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 9:43 am

If we demand accountability in government,then this is part of the process. Before “public” judgement is passed…let the U.S.House Ethics Committee do their job without bias or prejudice. There will be plenty of time for the know-it-alls when the report comes out.

avatar
WatchDog
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 10:37 am

Once a crook always a crook. I like to see Senator Bennett take his spot

avatar
Roger
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 11:04 am

You got him, Jeremy! Oh, wait. You didn’t.

avatar
Harold Harcourt
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 11:05 am

I’ve been a very good boy this year.
If Santa brings me what I really want he’ll be sharing a cell with Rick Scott next week.

avatar
Jan Schneider
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 11:20 am

BUCHANAN’S SO-CALLED “JOB CREATION ACT OF 2011″

The Federal Election Commission, the House Ethics Committee and the Department of Justice are all investigating ethical complaints against Representative Vern Buchanan from our Florida 13th congressional district. The allegations are extremely disturbing and must be resolved. But in a nation of laws, we must all await the outcomes of legitimate investigative and legal processes.

Meanwhile, such distractions may be diverting our attention from matters of great immediacy to our country and our district. Preoccupation with his alleged 2006-08 campaign finance violations may be keeping us from focusing on the policies Representative Buchanan is currently promoting. A case in point is H.R. 3487, euphemistically labeled the “Job Creation Act of 2011,” which our Congressman introduced on November 18, 2011.

Buchanan’s bill, H.R 3487, has nine titles, some with tenuous or no perceivable relation to its purported subject-matter:

Title I on “Trade” would express the “sense of the Congress” in favor of entry into force of Free Trade Agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea. Whether one agrees or disagrees with these problematical FTAs, at least this provision raises legitimate issues reasonably related to jobs and the economy. Title I also states concerns over violations of intellectual property rights, particularly by Chinese piracy, which pose grave international trade problems for the United States.

Title II on “Tax Reform” opines that comprehensive tax reform and reductions, coupled with reduced Federal spending, could lead to significant job creation. Its provisions are hortatory in nature and appear simplistic, but again the tax debate may be legitimately related to the supposed subject of the bill, “job creation.”

Title III on “Balanced Budget Amendment” is more tenuous. Many of us disagree with the proposed Amendment (although advocating balanced budgets); but for or against, our views have little to do with the issue of its job creation potential.

H.R. 3487 goes downhill from there. Title IV on “Energy” deals with oil and gas leasing with the coastal plain. While paying verbal homage to environmental protection, the provisions of this title could have just the opposite effect.

One must credit Title V on “Reduction in Federal Workforce” with dealing with “jobs.” It is difficult, however, to comprehend how blanketly mandating cutting the number of federal employees by 10% over the next four years is supposed to lead to significant job “creation.”

Title VI on “Repeal of Employer Health Insurance Mandate” shows considerable solicitude for employers, with little concern for possible adverse effects on working families. Of course, the health care debate is in-and-of-itself important, even crucial, but not as presented in this bill.

Title VII sounds innocuous as the “Secret Ballot Protection Act.” What it would actually do, however, is seriously to undermine employee free choice and collective bargaining rights.

Title VIII on “Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Improvements” descends into the ludicrous. This title would amend Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 to impose additional sanctions on attorneys for filing “frivolous lawsuits,” extend the federal rule to “state cases affecting interstate commerce” and impose far-reaching additional sanctions on attorneys. Such self-indulgent airing of Buchanan’s personal disenchantment with judicial proceedings in a bill supposedly dealing with “job creation” demeans that vital subject.

Finally, Title IX is entitled “Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act of 2011.” The Regulatory Flexibility Act has the commendable purpose of establishing the principle that federal agencies shall endeavor “to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale of businesses.” The proposed amendments in H.R. 3487 could, however, seriously affect careful balances between social and business goals of federal regulations.

The objective here is not detailed legislative analysis of H.R. 3487. Buchanan’s bill has no cosponsors and is not going anywhere fast. Rather, the point is to caution against falling prey to what we condemn in our elected representatives. Certainly, many of us have strong feelings abut Buchanan’s seemingly endless ethical challenges and about partisan politics generally. Meanwhile, however, our country is still in a highly precarious economic state, and vital matters are being determined either affirmatively or by default. We as citizens owe it to ourselves and to our electoral system to examine the issues of our times and to act upon them.

avatar
DannyK
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 11:24 am

It’s time for him to admit his guilt and just resign.

avatar
Jose DelMingal
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 12:58 pm

Thank you Vern for doing so much for Sarasota and the communities…We are so lucky to have you..Just think if we had the likes of a Jan Schneider we would be in really deep doo ddo..She is not only obnoxious she is dumb….Thank you Vern for getting things done for this community not like the Democrat Senator Nelson,talk about dumbells…Neson has done nothing not only for Sarasota but not even for Florida….He did get together with the FRAUD OBAMA and shut down NASA….Once again thanks Vern and did you see where moveon.org is going bankrupt just like the New York Times…Yipeeeeee !!!

avatar
Drew
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 12:59 pm

Look, Vern is clearly no saint. He is a businessman turned politician. Politics is like UFC. A blood sports. The guy has donated millions of dollars to worth charities and from all accounts done a nice job in Washington D.C. representing our area. Its Christmas Jeremy Wallace! You all are worse than the National Enquirer. I bought Vern $4,000 in Miami heat Dallas Mavericks NBA Finals tickets, and what thanks did I get. Coal in my stocking! Dude is not Mother Theresa, but he’s no worse than any other politican “playing the game”
Stop drinking haterade already. and let Vern Free! lol

avatar
Tom
Friday, December 23, 2011 at 1:39 pm

Ho hum.

No smoking gun has been/was found by the FEC. No e-mails, no phone messages, as alluded to by the accusers.

Wake me when there is actually evidence against Vern. It appears by the 5-0 FEC that evidence was not found by the FEC. Now Justice and HEC are at bat. Let real facts prevail not opinions.

avatar

[...] Committee extends investigation into Buchanan (Updated)“. See also “House Ethics Committee investigates Buchanan” and “Sarasota GOP defends [...]