Agents warn potential Citizens change could boost condo rates dramatically

/ Tuesday, December 13, 2011

UPDATE: Board postpones decision. Click here to see story.

Insurance agents are warning that rates could increase dramatically — more than quadrupling in some cases — for condominium owners near the beach if Florida’s state-run insurer approves a proposal today to limit hurricane coverage for buildings with many short-term rentals.

Under pressure from Gov. Rick Scott and many lawmakers to dump policies and reduce the state’s liability, the Citizens Property Insurance Corp. board is considering capping coverage at $1 million for buildings where more than 25 percent of units are rentals.

That would force residents of condominiums such as the Excelsior on Siesta Key — where 42 percent of the units are rentals and the seven buildings are worth $30 million — to get most of their insurance coverage on the unregulated surplus lines market.

Surplus market rates are significantly higher than the $600 residents currently pay for wind-only coverage.

“It’s a pretty major deal,” said Excelsior resident Walter Olson, who has been fighting the proposal as vice president of the Siesta Key Condo Council. “The cost is just going to be prohibitive for a lot of people.”

Citizens board member Carol Everhart, vice president of insurance services at BB&T bank in Tampa, estimated premiums could rise 450 percent. Such an increase could be damaging in a fragile economy and struggling real estate market.

“I don’t think our beaches can bear that right now,” Everhart told a subcommittee of the Citizens board late last month.

Everhart asked the board members on Citizens’ Actuarial & Underwriting Committee to delay the proposal but committee members voted to bring it to the insurer’s full board today.

Some insurance agents with experience in the condominium insurance business are fighting the proposal.

Michael Clarkson, president of All Lines Insurance in Clearwater, has been meeting with the 800 condo associations he represents, including 14 on Siesta Key, to encourage them to speak out.

Condo complexes with a large number of rentals “will get absolutely murdered” if this proposal passes, Clarkson said.

But John Rollins, a member of Citizens’ Actuarial committee called beach condos the “riskiest risks” and approved sending the recommendation for a full board discussion, noting that “these rates are among the most inadequate rates that Citizens has anywhere.”

Condo complexes should not “enjoy a massive subsidy in rate level by sitting on the beach in the most risky areas of Florida and sitting in the assessment account, ultimately, of every Floridian,” Rollins said.

The state created Citizens as an insurer of last resort amid increasing turmoil in the market, but it has become Florida’s largest insurer, with nearly 1.5 million policies. Scott has made no secret of his desire to greatly reduce that number, and the potential that the state would have to bail Citizens out after a massive storm.

Proposals to substantially shed policies failed in the Legislature earlier this year. Some insurance agents and condo owners see the 25 percent rule on rentals as a way to quietly dump policies by tweaking Citizens’ internal guidelines and avoiding legislative approval.

Rollins was outspoken about his intentions last month.

“I consider this an integral part of the package of changes that we can make on a non-statutory basis to limit Citizens’ probable maximum loss,” he said during the Actuarial committee meeting.

Citizens’ staff portrayed the changes as a simple “clarification.” They say the 25 percent rule has been informal policy for some time.

“We’re currently doing it and we have been doing it for awhile now so we’re not talking about a change in practice,” Citizens vice president of underwriting Debbie Murphy said during the committee meeting.

But Everhart, Clarkson and other insurance agents have noted that the manual for wind-only insurance policies never mentions the 25 percent rental rule and it was not enforced until the last few months.

“I don’t agree with what we’re doing in business practice right now,” Everhart told the committee, adding she was upset with “the way underwriting has been conducting itself for the last year.”

Citizens should “continue the way the manual reads and not the way we’ve been interpreting the changes over the past year,” Everhart said.

The change in approach has been confusing for insurance agents.

“The actions of Citizens underwriters over the last six months have been contrary to their actions over the last 20-year period,” said John Dauenheimer, a long-time agent with Insurance Service of Sarasota, which represents at least 75 condo buildings along Sarasota County’s barrier islands. “They changed their rules without changing the printed rules for the benefit of premium increases. Now they’re going to try to change the printed rules.”

Clarkson contends Scott is pressuring Citizens’ board and staff members to dump policies by any means possible.

“This is being directed by the governor,” Clarkson said. “This is his way to just get rid of the exposure with no thought for the people who can’t afford the increase in coverage.”

People such as Siesta Key resident Gerald Spore are concerned about the proposal’s impact on real estate and the overall economy. Rising insurance rates could hurt condo sales, leading to a glut of properties and continued price declines.

Rents could also increase, leading to fewer tourists said Spore, a resident of the Gulf & Bay Club. There is also more risk that coverage purchased on the surplus lines market could prove worthless after a major storm.

“It could make things much, much worse in Florida,” he said of the policy change.

avatar

Zac Anderson

email or call (941) 361-4836. Make sure to "Like" HT Politics on Facebook for all your breaking political news.
Last modified: December 14, 2011
All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published without permissions. Links are encouraged.

ADD A COMMENT (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
VIEWING 8 COMMENTS
avatar
wayne stevens
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 4:58 am

For a change I will back Scott. When you build or live out there you know the risk. Right now we are carrying the risk for them.

avatar
Dillberg
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 6:43 am

Any excuse to raise the rate. Ripoff

avatar
ROBERT BRIGHT
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 7:27 am

AM UNEMPLOYED BUT HAVE A CAR AND I HAVE TO PAY A STORM FEE ADDED TO MY INSURANCE BILL EVERY MONTH AND I DONT GET A BREAK, IT MUST BE NICE TO SIT IN YOUR CONDO ON THE BEACH AND HAVE ME HELP PAY FOR YOUR STORM INSURANCE. YOU LIVE IN A RISK ZONE YOU SHOULD PAY FOR IT IF YOU WANT INSURANCE, THESE CONDO RENTALS ARE MOSTLY INVESTMENTS, MAKE ALL RENTAL CONDOS OR HOMES IN RISK AREA COVER THIER OWN INSURANCE.

avatar
Bob
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 8:24 am

Of course there will be a condo owner outcry, they want to place the risk on everyone but themselves.

avatar
ed smith
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 9:19 am

I absolutely agree with Rick Scott. If you can’t afford the insurance to live on the water – then you don’t live on the water. Nobody else needs to subsidize it. I’m pretty sure that the free market will work it out. Either somebody that can afford to live there will move in or the condos will be torn down and replaced with private homes. The State of Florida needs to get out of the equation.

avatar
bob
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 11:12 am

wow !! the people who think this only applies to the conds on the beach have their heads in the sand themselves….this will pass on to all condos then all homes in florida….the writing is on the wall….

avatar
Charlotte Greenbarg
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 1:49 pm

I’m the president of the Broward Coalition, comprised of over 200 condos,HOA, community organizations, businesses that deal with Associations plus individuals who live in them. I’ve been blogging in the Sun-Sentinel about the insurance crisis that we’re being pushed deeper and deeper into.

What about people who bought 30 years ago on the water and now will be forced out of their homes? Free market? More like what they do to people in totalitarian regimes.

Do you think the people who live in tornado alley should be told to move if they can’t afford to insure their homes or rebuild after a disaster? I don’t.

What about the people who live where fault lines cause earthquakes?

Everyone in this country is subject to the uncertainties of nature’s wrath.

Let’s push the politicians to summon the courage to widen the risk pool for all disasters nationwide. Or get rid of them and find some who will. We’re Americans and we need to act like it.

avatar
Kit Koehler
Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 9:57 am

The ramifications of this is mind-blowing. Something rotten is afoot, there is some big plan in place but to what purpose I don’t know. Since “Charlie” the Insurance increased premiums has been upwards of 250%. This has caused many associations fees’ to grow to astronomical amounts. $650 to over $1000 per month on Manasota Key is prevelant at the Newer built (2003-present) associations and on Palm Island its worse(much). I know of one 145 owner complex that has sustained policy increases of over $100,000 (per year) from 2004 rates. A big association has more owners to trickle the increase down thru, but most are only 26-40 or so units, but suffer the same dollar increase. This causes up to $12.000 per year in fees per unit and that does not include the individual owners responsibility of his “walls-in” increases. Condo sales and resales have tanked because of this. The unit prices have dropped Hundreds of thousands of dollars (i.e 2005 price maybe $585000 is now $290000) and still they wont sell! This is not a value thing or appraisal thing of the units or buildings or associations its plain and simple a case of “cost prohibitiveness”.