Five key factors that will decide Buchanan-Fitzgerald race

/ Thursday, October 6, 2011

Take our poll: Can Keith Fitzgerald oust incumbent Vern Buchanan?

SARASOTA

What Keith Fitzgerald is talking about doing just does not happen in politics.

Beating a three-term congressional incumbent with deep pockets is about as rare as it gets in American politics. In 2010, 85 percent of all incumbent House members were re-elected. And in 2008 more than 98 percent won.

Still, there was the Sarasota Democrat on Thursday declaring that, not only that he was running against U.S. Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Longboat Key, but explaining why he thinks he will win.

“I wouldn’t do this if I didn’t think I could win,” said Fitzgerald, a political science professor at New College of Florida.

But can he?

Here are the five key factors that will decide whether Fitzgerald, 54, or Buchanan, 60, ultimately represents the region in Congress.

See The Five Factors: No. 1

Money

The cold hard reality is that it takes money to get a message out to voters and Buchanan has lots of it.

Money’s importance is even more pronounced in this region because candidates have to spend big on Tampa television stations to reach area voters.

Buchanan, one of the wealthiest members of Congress, starts with a big advantage, with more than $800,000 already in his campaign account and a proven ability to raise much more. In 2006, Buchanan, who once owned more than 20 car dealerships, spent about $8 million to win the 13th Congressional District – more than any candidate for Congress in the nation.

Of that amount, nearly $5.5 million came from his own accounts.

Fitzgerald, who has never raised more than $350,000 for a campaign, said he knows he can’t outspend Buchanan, but is convinced he can raise enough to be competitive.

He has built up a solid list of political donors willing to bet on him in the past. Influential area donors including Frank Brunckhorst and Caren Lobo know Fitzgerald well, and are connected to other potential donors who can help Fitzgerald raise money.

History shows it will take about $1.6 million — the average challengers spent to beat incumbents in 2010 — for Fitzgerald to have a shot at beating Buchanan..

Advantage: Buchanan

See The Five Factors: No. 2

Voter turnout

At first glance, the 13th District looks solidly Republican.

Just 34 percent of the registered voters in the 13th District are Democrats, compared with 45 percent for Republicans.

But a funny thing happens in presidential elections: Democrats and independents turn out in big numbers and can overcome Republican vote advantages here. It explains why in 2008 President Barack Obama and Republican John McCain were nearly dead even in Sarasota County, despite Republicans’ big voter registration edge.

Fitzgerald has to hope Obama stirs up enought passion to draw more Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to the polls. Even that is no guarantee they will vote for races down the ticket.

“Democrats have a better shot at taking a district like this in a presidential year, typically,” said David Wasserman, an analyst with the Cook Political Report, a D.C.-based publication that tracks the nations 435 House races.

Advantage: Fitzgerald.

See The Five Factors: No. 3

Redistricting

The election outcome could well be set in Tallahassee, where state legislators are starting to draw Florida’s 27 congressional district boundaries.

Though Republicans dominate the legislature, political experts say they could be forced to draw a district more favorable for Democrats because of new constitutional amendments aimed as stopping gerrymandering.

Currently, the 13th District includes all of Sarasota, Hardee and DeSoto counties, plus most of Manatee County and part of Charlotte.

But legislators will be under some pressure to put all of Sarasota and Manatee in one district of about 700,000 people — nearly ideal for a congressional seat.

That would remove Hardee, DeSoto and Charlotte counties, where Buchanan won big in 2006. Replacing those voters would be heavily Democratic areas in Palmetto and Bradenton, now in a neighboring district.

“There is a good chance it gets slightly better for Democrats,” Wasserman said.

To be sure, Buchanan would still have a sizeable name recognition in Manatee County, where Fitzgerald has little political experience. But the insertion of 3,000 solid Democratic votes would improve Democratic chances.

Advantage: Too soon to tell

See The Five Factors: No. 4

Campaign finance issues

Buchanan enters with plenty of political baggage for Fitzgerald to exploit.

Over the last six months, Buchanan admitted he had been under investigation by the Federal Election Commission, was accused of pressuring former business partners to sign a false affidavits to cover up a fundraising scandal, and was recently named to a government watchdog group’s list of “most corrupt” members.

All three issues are tied to his 2006 campaign for Congress, in which he was accused by former business partners and employees at his car dealerships of pressuring people to give to his campaign and then later reimbursing them – both violations of law.

Buchanan’s campaign has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and says the FEC investigation cleared him earlier this year.

Fitzgerald said the issues are fair game. He vaguely referred to them in declaring his candidacy, saying Buchanan has been “running from one scandal to the next.”

Expect more of that.

Advantage: Fitzgerald.

See The Five Factors: No. 5

Voting records

The race will be cast as the liberal college professor ve. the Republican drone.

Since Fitzgerald and Buchanan both have been in elective offices, they have voting records to ammunition for their opponent.

Already Sarasota Republicans are going after Fitzgerald’s voting history, accusing him of being soft on immigration for his support for allowing children of illegal immigrants access to state health care programs. It’s proof he is an “Obama-liberal,” said a press release sent by the Sarasota County Republican Party within hours of Fitzgerald’s announcement.

The party is run by Joe Gruters, Buchanan’s former campaign manager.

On the flip side, while Buchanan has touted his role on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, Fitzgerald is determined to show that to land that prestigious committee post, Buchanan has voted in lock-step with the Republican leadership, rather than representing the district.

No vote better illustrates the point than one on Medicare, Fitzgerald said. Despite representing a district with one of the highest number of Medicare recipients in the nation, Buchanan voted for a House budget proposal this year that would have turned it into into a voucher-based program.

Buchanan can argue that he is the only congressman from Sarasota or Manatee counties in more than 60 years to serve on the Ways & Means Committee – which has oversight over all federal tax policies and entitlement programs.

Advantage: Buchanan

 

To read Herald-Tribune reporter Jeremy Wallace's report on Keith Fitzgerald's announcement, click here.
avatar

Jeremy Wallace

Jeremy Wallace has covered politics for more than 15 years.He can be reached by email or call (941) 361-4966.""More Wallace"Make sure to "Like" HT Politics on Facebook for all your breaking political news.
Last modified: December 22, 2011
All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published without permissions. Links are encouraged.

ADD A COMMENT (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
VIEWING 14 COMMENTS
avatar
Dan
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 7:55 pm

6th key factor we can count on. In case of a tight race , Fitzgerald’s votes will somehow disappear.

avatar
nemov
Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 7:56 pm

I’m no fan of Buchanan, but unless the district is racially redrawn this race is no contest. If Buchanan was able to win during the worst election for the GOP in three decades his reelection is a near certainty.

avatar
Ed Smith
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 3:47 am

Keith Fitzgerald is wrong for Sarasota. He’s just another tax and spend Democrat.

He supports new taxes and increasing taxes while he opposes decreasing property taxes! Keith supported a state income tax and voted against cutting property taxes and a property tax cap.

This guy is even quoted as saying “We will have national health care” in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune on August 13th of 2009. I guess that means he’s for Obamacare.

Vern Buchanan is clearly the better choice.

avatar
ed taylor
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 5:20 am

Jeremy, you’ve been sipping the NYT punch too long. No way a raving, Obamaesque liberal has any advantage over Buchanan unless he’s got pics of Vern w/ barnyard animals or hugg’n Hillary. ‘Bama, Reid & Pelosi are clueless & out of their league, the never-saw-a-tax-we-don’t like mind set (not to mention their war on the small business owner, read ObamaCare) is sending this country into a tale spin. And Fitz is their man on the ground in Sarasota. Yeah, hope the Dems throw all they’ve got at this race…good way for them to burn through cash & resources so they can’t do harm elsewhere.

avatar
Leonard Goldstein
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 7:21 am

Mr. Buchanan has served long enough. Unfortunately he is the poster child for what is wrong in DC..too much money buying a place to govern people who need a more empathetic government. The money needed to be elected creates to great a separation between the governing and the governed. Mr. Fitzgerald is bright and energetic. He may have to moderate towards the middle and demonstrate he is his own person and not too Obamafied..he is very capable..hopefully he can move toward the middle and function as an independent?

avatar
Richard McNulty
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 7:21 am

Vern protects the rich and has done nothing for middle class. He is a large part of the problem in Washington. It is time for a change.

avatar
Tony
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 7:42 am

boomer paradise = myopic politics. advantage: buchanan

avatar
Rick Lewis
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 7:43 am

Vern Buchanan has one major thing going for him; he is a Patriot. Vern is big on Veterans rights and benefits. He understands that if it were not for the soldier, boots on the ground, this country would be in worse shape than it is now. Vern is one of the few veteran members of Congress that I highly support and respect. In contrast, our current President does not truly respect the American military, nor does he respect our Pledge or Flag. Vern is known for respecting the flag and salutes it proudly. Obama is famous for the crotch salute and refuses to wear a flag pin because he doesn’t want to “offend anyone”. Fitzgerald is the same way and comes from the same school; tax, tax, tax, and spread the wealth! I predict Buchanan in a landslide, as well it should be. Vern is one of the few veteran Congressman this country needs right now!

avatar
G.Patrick Miller
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 8:08 am

Mr. Buchanan is a rank & file politician, Period. He votes as told avoids the real issues and covers the the critical decisions w/smoke and mirrors.

He’s bought and paid for by the 1%’s……..Votes in favor of the 1%’s…….and is a 1%’or. ( in 2009 his net worth was 800 million by this year it is $1 Billion +)
I have nothing against making money,not a sin, it’s HOW you make it???…over $200,000,000.00 in 2 years?…in a recession/ Depression? ( Thank you W !)

What dribbles, drips, slides down on the rest of us is the, Republican Trickle Down Economy; THEY WANT TO DO IT AGAIN!

The President , has not been able to work effectivly or efficiently w/ his arms and legs bound together.

Vern & his gang of thugs have openly statedthey wanted to make the current Presidency inefective,they have, and they destruction of the United States is a necessary part of that stratagy. This man is an American Traitor; much worse than Benedict Arnold or John Wilkes Booth.

He and Most of the Republican Congress should be tried as enemies of the State.
W, Chaney & Romney are War Criminals and should die in prision.

The Kicker here; I’m a Republican, a member of the YR since 13, active in the party fo 50 years, a contributor, Campaign Director and Delegate.

The Republican Party of today is a gang of Super Rich Bullies with no ethics & no soul. Vern needs to Go!!!!!!

avatar
drd
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 8:09 am

Buchanan may have the incumbent’s advantage today. But if he continues blocking anything to help create jobs and improve the economy — and supporting attacks on Medicare — it will become clear to Sarasotans that he is part of the problem and must be voted out of office.

avatar
Joe G.
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 9:14 am

I am surprised that the level of bias in this story was not so obvious as usual, even though it was clearly present. Mr. Fitzgerald is a typical ultra-liberal/socialist democrat. Political Science professor at one of the most libel schools in the nation is all you need to know. Match him up against a person that has actually worked and created wealth and jobs, like Mr. Buchanan has done, and there really is no doubt which one would be better for our nation.

Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach.

avatar
D. Edmonds
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 10:09 am

The voters made it clear last election that Fitzgerald’s Socialist ideas and far-left agenda is not what the MAJORITY of this State agrees with. Fitzgerald is after a life-time paycheck. He does not represent the mindset of this district.

avatar
C McMillan
Friday, October 7, 2011 at 10:12 am

With due deference to the writers that think Buchanan is a patriot or has created wealth and jobs, I offer the following. Buchanan does not support veterans. He supports wars. If he supported veterans he would be advocating for adequate health care for veterans and their families and for jobs (good paying jobs) for veterans returning from the wars and retiring from service. Veterans injured in the line of duty should not have to worry about their health care or be forced to take a menial job as a result of their injuries. In reference to the “job creator” myth, Buchanan has claimed bankruptcy a couple of times. In doing so, he has made himself a multi-millionaire, but left many small businesses holding unpaid bills for services they gave to him. As a result some of them either went bankrupt or laid off employees. So, that really doesn’t seem like a person who is “a patriot” or “a job creator” does it?

avatar
Jesse Biter
Saturday, October 8, 2011 at 9:36 am

Jeremy you have it right:

Fitzgerald has to hope Obama stirs up enought passion to draw more Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to the polls.

However, Obama will stir up enough passion but not for Democrats.

I just don’t understand how people can think someone who has never created a job, made payroll, owned a business, etc… is the right person to help our economy recover (that was directed towards Fitzgerald and Obama). I’ve read a few medical books but that doesn’t make me a doctor. Someone might be an academic but until they have had their residency they shouldn’t be making policy. Further, Fitzgerald (an incumbent) lost to Ray Pilon,,, he thinks he can beat Buchanan?

Go ahead Fitzgerald and dig up old bones; it didn’t work then and it won’t work now. His donors (those helping him raise 1.6M) can watch their money wasted to the TV stations — enjoy.